SPY rocketed 57 spots in Tendie.bot’s daily ranking as retail investors shared sharply contrasting experiences with the S&P 500 ETF.
A harrowing
$SPY 0DTE loss story on r/options served as a cautionary tale about revenge trading and sizing up after a win.
A Motley Fool article published the same day argued that historical data favors lump-sum investing over waiting for a better entry, adding fuel to the ongoing “time in market vs. timing” debate.
The S&P 500 ETF ![]()
The most visceral post came from r/options, where a user detailed losing $12,803 over three months trading ![]()
On the other end of the spectrum, a r/smallstreetbets user shared an update on a journey from $22 to $540, holding call options on ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A third thread from r/ValueInvesting offered a different benchmark for the S&P 500. A user running a $1,000 dividend challenge account reported that their portfolio of 20 dividend stocks was up 3.21% over the past month, compared to the S&P 500’s -0.04%. The post highlighted picks like ![]()
![]()
![]()
Adding context to the day’s discussion, The Motley Fool published an article arguing that investors should not wait for a better entry point into the S&P 500. Despite the index trading at 20.4x expected earnings — above its 30-year average of 17.2x — a 2023 Vanguard study found that lump-sum investing outperformed dollar-cost averaging 68% of the time. The article noted that the market has experienced average intra-year drops of 14.2% but still produced positive annual returns in 35 of the last 46 years.
Taken together, the Reddit posts and the news piece capture the perennial tension in retail investing: the allure of quick gains through options, the discipline of dividend investing, and the data-backed case for simply staying in the market. ![]()
Subscribe to Tendie.bot for more market recaps.
