A Reddit user's detailed performance audit found they barely beat
$SPY before taxes — and likely underperformed after.
Kevin Warsh's first day as Fed Chair brings a historical tailwind: the S&P 500 has posted positive returns in 86% of Fed transition years.
A value fund with zero tech exposure is beating the S&P 500 by 4.1% annualized — sparking a debate on r/ValueInvesting about whether the index is overvalued.
On a day when Kevin Warsh officially takes the reins at the Federal Reserve, retail investors across Reddit are doing something unusual: they're measuring themselves against the S&P 500 — and coming away humbled. ![]()
The Retail Investor Reckoning
The most resonant post of the day came from r/investing, where a user laid out a detailed accounting of their stock-picking performance against the S&P 500. After time-weighting returns, adjusting for deposits, and factoring in cash drag — the idle 15-20% of capital waiting for entry points — they found their active sleeve returned roughly 11.2% annualized. ![]()
The post struck a nerve. It racked up 220 upvotes and 142 comments, many from users sharing similar experiences. The thread became a de facto group audit, with retail investors confronting the gap between how they feel about their returns and what the numbers actually show.
On r/wallstreetbets, the mood was rawer. One heavily upvoted post (3,500+ upvotes) captured the opposite end of the spectrum — a trader who has lost every position taken since June began, including ![]()
A New Fed Chair and a Historical Tailwind
Wednesday also marked Kevin Warsh's first day as Federal Reserve Chair, with markets expecting rates to remain at 3.50%-3.75%. A Benzinga analysis of the past seven Fed Chair transitions since 1970 found that the S&P 500 has historically delivered an average 1-month return of 2.3%, with 86% of episodes posting gains. Over 12 months, the average return rises to 7.9% — again with 86% positive outcomes.
The data offers a constructive backdrop for the index, though it comes during a period when tech-heavy ETFs have surged 40-45% since late March — far outpacing the S&P 500's 17% gain, according to a Motley Fool report. That divergence has pushed tech valuations to uncomfortable levels, with P/E ratios ranging from 34 to 44 compared to the S&P 500's 20.1.
![]()
The Anti-Tech Value Fund That's Beating the Index
A Barron's article shared widely on r/ValueInvesting added a fascinating counterpoint to the day's index-focused discussion. The Moerus Worldwide fund, managed by Amit Wadhwaney, has posted a 17.9% five-year annualized return — beating the S&P 500's 13.8% — without owning a single tech or AI stock. Wadhwaney describes AI valuations as nonsensical, instead holding positions in UniCredit, Natura Cosmeticos, and energy firms.
On r/ValueInvesting, the post sparked debate about whether the S&P 500's tech-heavy composition has made it a riskier benchmark than many investors realize. The fund's outperformance — nearly double the average foreign small/mid-cap fund's 9.6% return — offers a real-world example of beating the index by going where it doesn't.
What the Data Shows
Sentiment: 47% bullish, 32% bearish, 21% neutral.
Reddit sentiment around ![]()
Subscribe to Tendie.bot for more market recaps.
