FLWS Articles
reddit/

FLWS: Retail Traders Dig In as Short Squeeze Thesis Gains Momentum

Retail traders rallied around FLWS on December 16, pushing the stock to the top of discussion charts. Multiple subreddits analyzed data showing a widening imbalance between buying and selling efficiency, a zero-borrow event, and a float that believers say is heavily constrained.

  1. FLWS scored the number one spot on Tendie.bot’s ticker ranking with a sentiment of 0.76, fueled by 18 Reddit posts and 318 comments.

  2. Traders highlighted a “zero event” where all available borrow shares were taken and then returned without sparking a price crash, interpreting it as a sign of constrained supply.

  3. Multiple analysis posts claimed buying volume was 105 times more efficient at moving price than selling volume, reinforcing the squeeze narrative.

1-800-FLOWERS.COM Inc

FLWS
$FLWS was the top ticker in retail conversation on December 16, driven by an intense wave of posts across r/Shortsqueeze, r/smallstreetbets, and r/10xPennyStocks. Reddit users poured over borrow data, dark pool prints, and order-flow efficiency metrics, building a case that the stock’s float is extremely constrained and that short sellers are losing control.

The Borrow Squeeze Narrative

The most discussed event of the day was what one r/Shortsqueeze user called “the zero event.” At 12:11 PM ET, the number of shares available to borrow dropped to zero. By 12:42 PM, three million shares had been borrowed and then returned within 31 minutes. Despite that theoretical selling capacity, the stock only pulled back modestly from around $4.68 to $4.47. No massive volume spike or crash followed. The poster argued that the would-be sellers “couldn’t deploy them effectively” because buying pressure absorbed any attempt to push the price down.

That episode reinforced a thesis that had been building since the previous session. On December 15,

FLWS
$FLWS had rallied from around $3.91 to $4.30. A popular post on r/smallstreetbets argued that move was not retail buying or covering but “shorts reloading” — buying back 2.5 million shares to set up a dump on December 16. The author urged readers to buy every dip and hold, framing it as a rare chance to “take their ammo away because the float is so constrained.”

Efficiency Data Shows an Extreme Imbalance

Several users posted order-flow analysis claiming a dramatic asymmetry in how buying and selling volume moved the stock. One r/smallstreetbets post asserted that buying volume was 105 times more efficient than selling volume. With 71% of tick volume on the downtick and price still up 0.93%, the poster concluded that “shorts are dumping shares and price won’t go down.” Another post on r/10xPennyStocks showed dark pool trading at highs around $4.70–$4.74, which the author described as “settlement prints at the HIGH, not attacks.” They noted that 65,000 shares had moved through dark pools against only 27,000 FTDs due that day, implying forced settlement at elevated prices.

The same user flagged that Tuesday’s FTD count of 27,000 was small compared to the 306,000 FTDs scheduled for the next day, framing December 16 as a “warmup round.”

FLWS

Not all the discussion was technical. One r/smallstreetbets user posted a filing showing that Fund 1 Investments LLC had bought shares of
FLWS
$FLWS
, calling it “amazing news” and trying to contact the fund’s managing director. Another lengthy post from a self-described supply chain professional laid out a bullish fundamental thesis: the company is undervalued, family-owned, and undergoing a transformation, with a long-term accumulation strategy. That post drew 47 comments and 24 upvotes.

A more cautious voice in r/10xPennyStocks questioned the hype, asking “why is it so hyped it’s a gift company” and wondering what innovation or growth driver justifies the attention. That post received 29 comments, suggesting a healthy debate alongside the bullish consensus.

Sentiment and Engagement

Sentiment: 76% bullish, 12% bearish, 12% neutral.

Across 18 posts, overall sentiment on

FLWS
$FLWS was strongly positive at 0.76. The stock accumulated 332 upvotes and 318 comments, with the highest engagement coming from r/smallstreetbets (1,061 upvotes, 278 comments) and r/10xPennyStocks (531 upvotes, 625 comments).

The most upvoted post came from r/Shortsqueeze with 75 upvotes and 75 comments, warning that “Today is a dump day” but urging holders to buy the dip. A r/smallstreetbets post describing the stock as “the next big squeeze” earned 53 upvotes and 15 comments, while multiple posts across r/10xPennyStocks racked up 22–33 upvotes each with lengthy comment threads.

Subscribe to Tendie.bot for more market recaps.